Iron Mountain - Comparative Multiple Analysis

Iron Mountain (Comparative Multiple Analysis)

placeholder_large_analysis.png

Notes on the Comparative Multiple Analysis of Iron Mountain

WikiWealth compares Iron Mountain's revenue, EBITDA, and EBIT multiples to their peers in order to determine the appropriate fair valuation. Click in the top right corner to experiment with Iron Mountain's comparative analysis.

Notes from the analysis:

1. WikiWealth uses quantitative measures to determine the multiple range for Iron Mountain.
2. Free cash flow to the firm (FCF) multiple is free cash flow to equity holders plus interest owed to Iron Mountain's debt holders.
3. Multiples incorporate benefits due to economies of scale; WikiWealth compares absolute enterprise value multiples to competitor's multiples.
4. WikiWealth excludes outliers when calculating individual company multiples.

Helpful Information for Iron Mountain's Analysis


How does this work? The Comparative Investment Analysis determines the value of Iron Mountain by comparing Iron Mountain financial ratios, prices, growth rates, margins, etc. to those of relevant peer groups.

Value Investing Importance? This method is widely used by investment professionals to determine the correct price of investments, especially initial public offerings (IPOs). It is one element of WikiWealth's three Wall Street approaches used to determine the correct fair value of Iron Mountain.

See the Iron Mountain cash flow (DCF) analysis for a completely different approach that's popular on Wall Street for determining the value of an investment in Iron Mountain.

Also, see the Iron Mountain's buffett intrinsic valuation analysis for WikiWealth's attempt to replicate the investing formula's used by Warren Buffett and Iron Mountain's valuation conclusion for a quick summary.